At his inaugural meeting with the
members of staff of the Ministry of Power, the new Minister of Power,
Works and Housing, Mr. Babatunde Fashola, reportedly inquired if the
problems with the Nigerian power sector were man-made or systemic.
For the former governor of Lagos State,
whom Nobel laureate Prof. Wole Soyinka fondly described as a “mechanic”
for his methodical approach to and efficiency in solving problems, this
inquiry is not surprising. It is a mark of a germane type of curiosity,
which seeks understanding as a pathway to improvement. It also hints at
such a discretion that would rather not rush in where angels should fear
to walk, seeing that most of his predecessors have had their
reputations scarred while treading the same tempting but treacherous
grounds into which he was about to step with that meeting. Need I name
such predecessors or relive their experiences to drive home the wisdom
of what I perceive as Fashola’s cautious and open-minded approach to his
new office and its grave responsibilities?
And to answer his question, relying on
my experience working as a maintenance crewman in the then National
Electric Power Authority and thereafter in various capacities in the
power sector: The problems with the Nigerian power sector are both
man-made and systemic. They are man-made because they are largely
created by humans and systemic because those who create them are part of
systems inclined to perversity. (In another sense, they are systemic
because they arise from a system bogged down by technical and other
inadequacies, in which case they can be addressed by eliminating such
inadequacies.)
Unfortunately, the stories to justify
this answer, drawn from my personal experiences while working in NEPA,
are too long to be accommodated by this piece. But suffice it to say
that they show how some of the problems in the power sector are created –
and persist – because those who create them from within and outside the
sector profit from them, and seem determined to continue to do so
indefinitely. Such people, and the negative forces behind them, are no
respecter of persons, virtue or vice. Their only interest is their
survival and the sustenance of the profits they derive by creating such
problems.
Therefore, solving such problems would
entail getting rid of such illicit profit bases. But there is no easy
way to achieve this even for a change agent with the legendary powers of
a Hercules, to which I doubt that Fashola would lay claim. For it would
threaten many entrenched interests determined to ensure their survival,
besides requiring a sweeping change in our citizens’ attitude to
protecting our nation’s interest. But the problems are surmountable if
the right things are done of which further details cannot also be
accommodated by this piece due to their length.
However, I shall proceed below with
specific instances of what Fashola may do to improve his chances of
succeeding as the Minister of Power.
First, he should harmonise the
activities of the various agencies in the power sector to work in
synergy towards improving the power situation in our country. In some
cases, the agencies and their heads have tended to operate as rivals
rather than partners in progress, creating friction that could undermine
the common goal of improving power supply in our country. By such
harmonisation, he would be putting in a more efficient harness the human
and managerial resources in the sector, which is the fulcrum of all
other resources.
It is desirable to continue to develop
the power sector multi-dimensionally, through projects in the areas of
solar, biomass and wind power. But to succeed as the Minister of Power,
Fashola may need to guard against spreading government’s developmental
efforts in the sector too broadly, considering the attendant risk of
making an overall low impact in terms of power availability. By this, I
mean that he should focus on what is most easily achievable to improve
power generation, while striving to match improved generation with
improved transmission and distribution capacities by commensurate
infrastructural development across the entire value chain of the power
system.
For instance, some of the plants built
under the National Integrated Power Project have been inaugurated but
are not generating at full capacity. Altogether, the plants have a
generating capacity of 4,775 megawatts, which is slightly higher than
the quantum of power currently being generated in our country. So, we
can practically double the amount of power we currently generate to
about 9,000 megawatts by ensuring that the NIPP plants operate at full
capacity and aligning that performance with our transmission and
distribution capacities. With the overall completion stages of the 10
NIPP plants located nationwide having exceeded 80 per cent, they are
what a former Minister of Power, Prof. Bart Nnaji, described as
“low-hanging fruits”.
Therefore, as his second step to success
as the Minister of Power, Fashola should focus on plucking these fruits
and securing them in the nation’s power generation basket while
propping up the transmission and distribution capacities of the power
sector to support the resultant dramatic increase in power availability.
Slightly extended, this implies consolidating our current capacity to
generate power from hydro and gas-powered stations, which already has
the most developed infrastructure and potential for immediate impact in
our country. At a time when funds are generally believed to be scarce,
too much emphasis cannot be placed on the need for such concentration of
effort.
Thirdly, he should champion an
improvement of regulation in the power sector, and see to the
smoothening of any creases in the regulatory agencies’ understanding and
performance of their responsibilities. This is important because
regulation is critical to the success of the power sector
post-privatisation, and each of the regulatory agencies, such as the
Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Bureau of Public
Enterprises, and the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency,
have important roles to play in the sector.
For instance, while NERC acts as an
omnibus policeman of compliance with extant rules of engagement in the
sector, especially in terms of service delivery and tariff-related
issues, the other regulatory agencies have more specialised roles that
can be executed side by side with NERC’s, if the focus is the common
good or the nation’s interest. The BPE, for instance, undertakes the
post-privatisation monitoring of the power companies in line with
agreements they signed with the Nigerian government, while NEMSA
monitors the quality of equipment in use or for deployment in the sector
– like meters, transformers, etc. – to ensure that they meet the
necessary standards. So, the three types of regulation can be described
as general (for NERC), specific (for BPE) and technical (NEMSA), and can
co-exist with the executing agencies for ease of implementation and
improved efficiency. With this arrangement, the theory of division of
labour and its advantages come to mind.
Clearly, there are many more things
Fashola can do to succeed as the Minister of Power, but I cannot include
them here owing to space constraints. But even those I have highlighted
here can take a whole tenure of four years or longer to achieve,
considering how slow progress can be in the power sector even with
relentless hard work such as he is noted for.
Comments
Post a Comment